Berfu Cengiz vs Amina Anshba Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Cengiz vs A. Anshba

Berfu Cengiz
TUR
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
26
Age
26
-
Height
-
431
C. Rank
703
190
Best Rank
278
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$10.3K
Career Money
$8.2K
-
Plays
-

Amina Anshba
RUS
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
3
Win
3
Played
0
Win
26
Age
26
-
Height
-
431
C. Rank
703
190
Best Rank
278
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$10.3K
Career Money
$8.2K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Cengiz 3 - 0 Anshba
They have played 6 sets in total, with Berfu Cengiz winning 6 and Amina Anshba winning 0. The last match between Berfu Cengiz and Amina Anshba was at the W100 Les Franqueses del Valles, 22-10-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Berfu Cengiz getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cengiz | 3 |
| Anshba | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Les Franqueses del Valles(10-22-24)
Berfu Cengiz
6
6
Amina Anshba
4
4
(R2) W50 Meerbusch(08-29-24)
Berfu Cengiz
6
6
Amina Anshba
3
3
(R1) Curitiba(02-28-17)
Berfu Cengiz
6
6
Amina Anshba
4
1
B. Cengiz vs A. Anshba H2H Profile
B. Cengiz vs A. Anshba Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berfu Cengiz has won 37.09% of points on their second serve, while Amina Anshba has won 32.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berfu Cengiz, in recent form, has won 51.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Amina Anshba has won 56.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.20% and 33.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berfu Cengiz has saved 45.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amina Anshba has saved 38.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berfu Cengiz has won 43.33% of matches played (W/L 13/17), with Amina Anshba winning 45.45% (W/L 15/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berfu Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 124/70), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Amina Anshba has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 227/156), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 2/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Berfu Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 12/12), where as Amina Anshba has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Berfu Cengiz winning 3 times and Amina Anshba being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Berfu Cengiz winning 6 and Amina Anshba winning 0.
- The last match between Berfu Cengiz and Amina Anshba was at the W100 Les Franqueses del Valles, 22-10-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Berfu Cengiz getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:20.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berfu Cengiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 333.8 while Amina Anshba has played against players with an average rank of 378.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berfu Cengiz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amina Anshba has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berfu Cengiz has converted 43.40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amina Anshba has converted 39.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Berfu Cengiz vs Amina Anshba Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Cengiz vs A. Anshba H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 36 | Games Won | 19 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:26:20 | Average Match Time | 1:26:20 |
| 62% (110/177) | 1st Serve % | 65% (111/170) |
| 59% (65/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (55/111) |
| 49% (33/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (16/59) |
| 70% (21/30) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (12/22) |
| 58% (99/170) | Return Points Win % | 45% (79/177) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Cengiz 46%, Anshba 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Cengiz 61%, Anshba 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Cengiz 47%, Anshba 55%.
B. Cengiz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
SF | L | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
A. Anshba Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||

B. Cengiz vs A. Anshba Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.06% (270/195) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.44% (276/213) |
| 55.97% (600/472) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.55% (616/493) |
| 52.42% (5073/4604) | Games Win/Loss | 53.09% (5306/4688) |
| 52.74% (77/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.22% (42/40) |
| 63.92% (124/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.27% (227/156) |
| 55.65% (69/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29.17% (7/17) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 476 | Aces Total | 227 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1459 | Total Double Faults | 704 |
| 1:21:16 | Average Match Time | 1:38:37 |
| 520.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 521.42 |
| 62% (17219/27973) | 1st Serve % | 72% (20266/28117) |
| 59% (10232/17219) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (11235/20266) |
| 45% (4847/10755) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3502/7852) |
| 49% (1898/3843) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2026/3961) |
| 48% (13573/28521) | Return Points Win % | 49% (13895/28245) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Main Tour W/L | 23.53% (4/13) |
| 55.65% (187/149) | Challenger W/L | 50.87% (176/170) |
| 71.84% (74/29) | Futures W/L | 76.19% (96/30) |
| 58% (263/456) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (274/487) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (44/86) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (38/79) |
| 56% (81/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (67/133) |
| 85% (251/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (283/251) |
| 14% (251/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (283/32) |
| 25% (214/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (206/25) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Ignacio Buse vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
17:45
H2H 0-0
17:50
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico